smarken blog

Digital Sovrignty, Privacy, EU Law & Legislation, IT, Linux

F-Droid 2.0 - største update i årevis

- Indlæg i Android af

Mental Outlaw https://www.youtube.com/@MentalOutlaw

Mistral resume ud fra transcript:

Resume: F-Droid 2.0 – YouTube-transkript

Hovedpointer:

  • F-Droid har fået sin største opdatering i ca. et årti (2.0) – netop som Google er ved at stramme grebet om Androids åbenhed.

Hvad er F-Droid? - Et open source-alternativ til Google Play Store, samt et repository-system og distributionsværktøj for Android-software. - Ingen registreringsgebyr, ingen krav om Google-konto, ingen ID-verificering, og ingen 30 %-provision af indkøb – i modsætning til Play Store. - På trods af mindre "gatekeeping" er der markant mindre malware end på Play Store. Softwaren er open source og kan inspiceres.

Nye opdateringer i 2.0: - Fuldt redesignet UI bygget fra bunden med Kotlin Compose – langt mere moderne end den gamle klient, der føltes forældet (mange brugte i stedet tredjepartsklienter som Droidify og Neo Store). - Bedre søgning: Søger nu i beskrivelser, oversættelser og opdagelsessider – man behøver ikke længere kende appens præcise navn. - Parallelle opdateringer: Flere apps kan downloades/opdateres samtidig. - Anti-feature-filtrering: Man kan skjule apps med f.eks. tracking eller ikke-fri kode. - Bedre repository-håndtering, installationsinfo og overførsel af indstillinger (inkl. proxy og Tor). - Ulempe: Betaversionen mangler endnu ordentlig UI til tablets.

Alternative klienter/kilder: - Droidify (automatiske baggrundsopdateringer) og Neo Store (ca. 100 indbyggede repositories, filtre, reproducible build-indikatorer) – browses stadig F-Droid-repos. - Obtainium – springer repository-modellen over og henter APK'er direkte fra GitHub/GitLab/Codeberg-releases. Hurtigere adgang til nye versioner, men med større ansvar for tillid selv.

Googles modtræk – "Android developer verification": - Udviklere skal betale gebyrer og igennem flere kontroller for at udgive på Play Store (officielt for at bekæmpe malware). - Sideloading bliver sværere: krav om udviklertilstand, advarselsvinduer, genstart og en 24-timers ventetid på hver ny enhed. Restriktionen kører via Google Play services, så Google kan stramme yderligere (f.eks. helt blokere sideloading) når som helst. - ADB-installation via computer omgår blokken – ironisk nok ligesende som sideloading på iOS.

Konklusion: F-Droids svage punkt var aldrig apps, men brugeroplevelsen. Med 2.0 (bedre søgning, hurtigere opdateringer, klarere sikkerhedsinfo) er F-Droid endelig et reelt alternativ, præcis som kampen om app-distribution på Android intensiveres. Videomagerens råd: Prøv 2.0-betaen på telefon; tablet-brugere bør vente på den færdige version.


Transcript : Froid just got its biggest update in about a decade, and the timing couldn't be better because Google is in the middle of changing the one thing that made Android better than iOS, the ability to install whatever software you want. F-Droid 2.0 completely rebuilds the app's interface, makes finding software easier, improves updates, and adds more warnings when something sketchy happens with an app. So, this update is a lot more than just a UI overhaul. If you've never used Froid before, the easiest way to describe it is as an alternative open-source app store for Android, but there's a bit more going on under the hood. Foy is also a repository system and a collection of tools for distributing Android software that is much kinder to developers than Google is. If you want to distribute software on the default Android Play Store, you have to go through a registration process with Google, which includes paying a fee to Google, agreeing to Google's terms and conditions, sending Google your governmentissued identification, providing evidence of your private signing key, and listing all current and future application identifiers. And if your application has inapp purchases, Google is going to take a 30% cut of all of your profits. But Froid lets software be distributed in a way that it's meant to be. And despite the lack of gatekeeping that Froid has compared to the Google Play Store, there's far less malware being distributed there. The official Foid repository focuses on free and open- source apps, but the client can connect to other Foid compatible repositories, too. You don't need a Google account and since the software is open source, you can inspect what the client itself is doing instead of trusting a mystery APK that some guy uploaded to a random website. And there are some really useful programs in these repositories that you can't even find in the normal Google Play Store. New Pipe is probably the best known example because it gives you a lightweight alternative frontend for YouTube and SoundCloud and a couple other sites that usually have a lot of ads that you have to watch or require you to log in in order to view content on them. There's also the Aurora Store, which gets kind of meta because it's an open-source alternative client for Google Play itself. So, you can use an alternative app store to install an alternative interface for the official Google Play Store, which then lets you install apps without ever having to sign into a Google account. Termox is another good example of why these alternative sources matter. So, Termox is basically a terminal that lets you do cool developer power user things on an Android device. And there is technically a Termox build on Google Play, but the Termox developers still recommend that most people use the Froid or GitHub versions because the Play Store build comes from a separate codebase and has changes in missing functionality because of Google Store policies. So, if you want to turn your Android phone into a little Linux terminal and SSH into random servers and edit files with your favorite NeoVim configuration while you're sitting on the toilet, then that Termox version is the one that you're going to want to use. The main reason for the 2.0 upgrade in Froid was that even though the Froid ecosystem had some really good software, the official Froid client itself was starting to feel old. A lot of people who use Froid repositories don't even use the Froid app to browse them anymore. They use thirdparty clients like Droidify or Neo Store because those apps had cleaner interfaces, better filtering, and some extra power user features. 2.0 is basically the official client catching up with the ecosystem that has been built around it. The interface looks really nice in my opinion. and it was rebuilt from scratch with Cotlin Compose which is Google's modern UI toolkit for Android. Unfortunately, the beta that's out right now doesn't have a proper UI for tablets. It has this big version 2.0 message that's taking up most of the screen and I couldn't find any settings to change it. But on phones, the UI looks normal and a lot more modern than the old Foid UI. The layout feels much closer to a current Android application and the whole thing is much less likely to make someone who installs it for the first time think that they accidentally download an app store from 2014. The search feature also got a very much needed upgrade. So older versions of Android relied a lot more on you knowing what the app you wanted was actually called. Version two searches through the descriptions and translations and the discovery pages so that it can highlight popular downloads. And there's also better filters, including filters for Foy's anti-features. So, if you search for something broad like a password manager or video games, you have a better chance of finding the program that you actually need instead of needing to know the exact package name like you're using Pac-Man on Arch. Installing and updating apps is also less painful. Froid can now download and update multiple applications at the same time. During the 2.0 development cycle, Froid added the anti-feature filtering. So, if you wanted to avoid tracking or non-free code, for example, you can hide apps that have that whenever you're doing a search for stuff. There's better repository handling. There's better app install information, serer details, and migration of settings from the old client, including proxy and tour settings. But like I said earlier, Froid is not your only option for an alternative to Google Play. Droidify and Neo Store, well, they aren't really separate app repositories that are competing against Froid in the same way that Epic Games Store competes against Steam. They're alternative clients that both browse foid compatible repositories. Droidify gives you automatic background updates and custom repositories. Neo Store goes even heavier on repository management with extensive filters, reproducible build indicators, privacy information, and around 100 built-in repositories. So, if you already started using one of those apps because you didn't like the old Foid, you can continue using them and still benefit from the Foid ecosystem underneath. Then there's Optanium, which is a little different because it skips the traditional repository model almost entirely. You can point Optanium directly at a GitLab, GitHub, or Codeberg project and have it watch the release page for new APKs. It also supports Froid repos, direct APK links, and a ridiculous number of other sources. That means that instead of waiting for an Froid build to appear after the developer releases a new version, you can sometimes download the developer release directly. The trade-off is that you're moving more of the trust decision into your own hands. And some Optaneium sources rely on web scraping that can break when websites change. It's basically an Android package manager for people who want bleeding edge software. And having all of these ways to install software is part of what has historically made Android so interesting. But like I mentioned earlier, Google is adding new restrictions called Android developer verification, which require developers to pay a fee and jump through multiple hoops before they can publish software on the Google Play Store. Google's stated reason for doing this is to fight malware because of course every other week there's some package on the Google Play Store that's been downloaded hundreds of thousands of times and turns out to be a Trojan. And in addition to restricting developer access to the Play Store, Google is going to make it much harder for users to sideloadad applications onto their own phones. Now, they aren't completely blocking people's abilities to install alternative stores or install APKs that are downloaded from the web, but to do it, you're going to have to put your phone into developer mode, click through several screens that are warning you about the danger of thirdparty apps, restart the phone, and then wait 24 hours for the block to be lifted, which is the biggest limiting factor. Anytime you get a new phone or tablet, you're going to have to wait until the next day to install all of the applications that you want. And as pointed out here on keepandroid open.org, this lockdown runs through Google Play services. So Google can change the flow whenever they want. They can make you wait a week to unlock it or block sideloading completely if they really wanted to, which seems to be the real goal here. Google wants to be like Apple so bad and soon the difference between the two is going to be razor thin. You can still install apps on Android via ADB without going through all the steps I mentioned earlier besides enabling developer mode of course. And so the easiest way to install apps to Android in the first 24 hours of getting your device is going to be to connect the phone to a computer and then load the apps on with ADB, which ironically is about the same way that you have to sideloadad apps onto an iOS device. And of course, when you add the complexity of another device, a terminal, and a USB cable, the process becomes too cumbersome for most users to go through, even if they're curious about an app that can't be downloaded from the official Play Store. But even though Google is creating more Roblox to having an open Android device, the Foy 2.0 0 update is helping to close that gap that's existed for years. The weak point was never lack of apps on Froid, but rather the user experience when it compared to the Play Store. Froid 2.0 is bringing better search, faster updates, better discovery, and clearer security information right as alternative app distribution is becoming a much bigger fight. So, if you've never used Froid or avoided it because of its outdated interface, check out the 2.0 beta. If you're using a tablet or wider screen Android, you probably want to wait for the finished version that hopefully has a better UI for those screens. If you enjoyed this video, please like and share to act the algorithm and check out my online store, base.win, where you can buy my awesome merch and accessories for your phone or laptop. 10% storewide discount when you pay with Monero XMR at checkout. Have a great rest of your day.

“They need trillions of dollars in revenue. Who’s going to pay it?”

Senior Distinguished Fellow at the Center for Economic and Policy Research Dean Baker joins The Tech Report’s Isaac Pound to talk about how some of the founding principles of the AI industry are now in question after business leaders admit they’re not using frontier models.

Comments:

@teamspeak9374 for 18 timer siden On one side you got highly credited independent economists, journalists and researchers saying the economics makes no sense. On the other side you have a bunch of tech bros saying to close your eyes to reality cause AI will fix it. I wonder who's more credible 🤔 579 Svar 71 svar @15tt-b3h for 17 timer siden This will be the third major global economic bubble to affect my adult life. What a time to be alive! 343 Svar 36 svar @joemclemore3503 for 17 timer siden It will be a cold day in hell when I turn over any of my personal dealings the Meta's "agent" muse. It's malware/spyware on freakin' steroids. 193 Svar 8 svar @arandmorgan for 15 timer siden Do you mean, due to their extreme wealth and power they suffered so much from the isolation away from normal people, that their disconnect led to them providing a service or product that nobody wants. Who could have thought that? 37 Svar 2 svar @georgemcbay for 12 timer siden Mike Ehrmantraut from Breaking Bad knows a lot about the economics of AI. 12 Svar @tomryan3012 for 18 timer siden Salesforce bet the company on their AI product ‘Agentforce’, they were even going to rename Salesforce to Agentforce. It failed so badly that they’ve backtracked and teamed up with Anthropic, rebranding to AIforce.

Internally, salespeople are struggling to sell AI tooling. Credit consumption models are a CFO’s nightmare

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=yGVdI0C_2Ro https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGVdI0C_2Ro

The Linux Lighthouse, your guide to Linux

Welcome to The Linux Lighthouse, Your openSUSE Linux Guide! In this video, we'll dive deep into systemd, the core of system and service management on Linux. If you're using openSUSE Linux, this guide is for you! We'll cover everything you need to know about systemd-from basic commands for managing services to advanced customizations with unit files, snapshots, and timers. Learn how to control your system's startup, schedule jobs like a pro with systemd timers, and debug services using journalctl. With clear examples and step-by-step instructions, this is your ultimate guide to mastering systemd on openSUSE Leap!

What You'll Learn:

Understanding systemd and its advantages
Essential systemctl commands for managing services
Switching and configuring targets (runlevels)
Customizing systemd with unit files
Creating system snapshots for safe rollbacks (deprecated)
Scheduling tasks with systemd timers
Managing temporary directories and cleaning them automatically
Monitoring logs and debugging with journalctl

Whether you're a beginner or a sysadmin, this video will give you the tools to take control of your openSUSE Linux system. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the bell icon to get notified about new Linux tutorials!

🔗 Resources:

Official systemd Documentation: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Soft...


openSUSE Reference Manual: Official systemd Documentation: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Soft...

Online Shop US - https://the-linux-lighthouse.myspread... Online Shop EU - https://the-linux-lighthouse.myspread... Buy Me a coffee ☕️: https://buymeacoffee.com/thelinuxligh...

Linux #systemd #openSUSE #LinuxTutorial #openSUSELeap #opensusetumbleweed #SystemManagement #LinuxForBeginners #LinuxAdministration #TechTutorial #LinuxCommands #openSUSELinux #ITTraining #LearnLinux #linuxtutorial #tech

AI-genereret videooversigt AI kan begå fejl, så sørg for at dobbelttjekke dens svar.

The Linux Lighthouse explores systemd, the Linux initialization and service manager. The guide details how to use systemctl for process management, configure custom unit files, schedule tasks with timers, automate temporary file cleanup, and monitor logs using journalctl on openSUSE.

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=l6ZcFa8pybE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6ZcFa8pybE

How did we go from digital computers to AI seemingly everywhere? Neil deGrasse Tyson, Chuck Nice, & Gary O’Reilly dive into the mechanics of thinking, how AI got its start, and what deep learning really means with cognitive and computer scientist, Nobel Laureate, and one of the architects of AI, Geoffrey Hinton.

Hinton explains the fundamental shift from logic-based rule programming to the biological approach: building systems that learn the way a brain does. Learn about the history of computer science that led to the breakthroughs we have today. We break down the structure of artificial neural networks and the meaning of AI buzzwords like “deep learning” really mean. You’ll learn about the layering of data processing and how the first layer of neurons might detect a simple edge, the second a beak, and the third a bird’s head.

Hinton explains the light bulb moment of backpropagation, the mathematical breakthrough using calculus to send force backward to strengthen previous connections. Is this a process we share with neural nets? We discuss whether AI thinks like us and explore why AlphaGo succeeded in beating us at our own game by generating its own data and whether LLMs will hit a ceiling as they run out of human-written text. Can AI reason? What does it mean for something or someone to think?

As the science turns toward the future, we tackle heavy questions regarding the massive energy demands of data centers and whether AI can reinvent solar technology to save itself. Hinton discusses the "Volkswagen Effect," where a model might strategically underperform to avoid being unplugged. We dive into consciousness to ask if subjective experience is just a byproduct of complex perception and if chatbots already possess it. What are the upsides as well as the downsides? The singularity isn’t imminent yet... but the "yet" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

Thanks to our Patrons Kylie Jonasson, Bryan Pfeifer, Anton Couzens, Brad Smith, Jeffdrumseitz, Richard Vaughan, sSHEScience©, Ben Mondoux, Julien Ballez, Tom, Matteo Berlanda, Dr. Cool Young Booger Results Murray, Shawndra Hill, Mike Easter, Charles Shields, Xander-Tony Kehr, Chase Busha, Leah, Justin Harris, Stephen Schultz, Jason West, ImaPerson, Argie Weatherington, Ted Barnett, MD, Lizzie O'Grady, Kimja, Paul Baltatescu, Hanna Cantley, Bill Hoffman, FreddieAbdon, Trish, Muath, Timeless Angel, Dxly, Michael Fuery, Tom Hadrava, Guy Eran, Max Murphy, Cristy Nourash, Donita Buchheit, Kel, Screaming Firehawk, Patricia Churchland, Mikael Stenberg, Dale Duncan, Ghostpacho, Nathan Lehenbauer, James Schaedler, Andrew G, Samuel Sladkovský, Punished Leno, Chris L, George Papura, Miguel Basto, Brittney Starkey, David Rouisse, WTFbro Podcast, Marvin, Jason Driscoll, Yasyoc, Donte Jones, Trevor, Andrew, Jared Harrison, Terence Garrod, TheCrassDragon, Daithon Brown, Perkins, Brendan Gost, Daria Shkrabachenko, Tania Cortes Alonso, JD, Jacob Westman, Lacey Rae Castleberry, Isaac Castrillo, Eric Bouliane, Tim The Secular Humanist, João Sampaio, Aegor, Evan Schreier, Amanda Burris, Allen Arthur, Vikas Jain, Jeroen Wilms, Nathan Schepker, Sverre Moe, Ruth Crisp, Legend Omega, B Dubbz, Jay Youmans, Nite Stalker, Adrian Hungate, Marguerite Nesfield, Michael Engelman, Scott Donner, Diamir Elliott, Warsame Giuled, Kansas Dan, Rey Pierantoni, and Rick Servello for supporting us this week.

Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction: Geoffrey Hinton 03:00 - Approaches to Make and Intelligent System 07:19 - How Artificial Neural Nets Work 14:12 - Making a Neural Net By Hand 24:41 - Backpropigation Breakthrough 33:44 - Why AI Seemed to Arrive So Fast 34:39 - What is Thinking? 37:50 - Is AI Better at Learning? 47:41 - Can We Humanize AI? 50:58 - Setting Up Guardrails 54:04 - Is AI Lying to Us? 58:47 - Will AI Be the End of Us All? 01:00:51 - Does AI Hallucinate? 01:04:36 - The Upside 01:08:13 - Will AI Create More AI? 01:10:17 - AI Nuclear Winter: Will We Unite? 01:15:10 - 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics 01:16:44 - The Price of Replacing All the Jobs 01:22:50 - Achieving Consciousness 01:28:37 - The Work to Be Done Before the Singularity

Check out our second channel, @StarTalkPlus

Get the NEW StarTalk book, 'To Infinity and Beyond: A Journey of Cosmic Discovery' on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3PL0NFn Support us on Patreon: / startalkradio

FOLLOW or SUBSCRIBE to StarTalk: Twitter: / startalkradio
Facebook: / startalk
Instagram: / startalk

StarTalk #NeildeGrasseTyson

The Open Source Internet Is Here

- Indlæg i Teknologi af

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=5vbl5FL-nsI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vbl5FL-nsI

1,600 Miles with this...

I spent three weeks trying to bridge Reticulum onto HF so two people could pass a real message hundreds of miles with no cell tower, no Starlink, and nobody in the middle charging a toll. The radio is a Hermes Lite 2. The hard part isn’t only the physics — U.S. amateur rules also forbid hiding the meaning of a message on these bands, so whatever goes over the air has to be legal. This is an attempt to build an open-source internet we actually own, using the sky as the hop.

Parallel Primer — the course for how the hardware, radios, and software fit together:
👉 https://buildwithparallel.com/product...

Haven — the node I use in the field:
👉 https://buildwithparallel.com/product...

CrossTalk: Reticulum Workbench https://github.com/buildwithparallel/...

Build the open-source internet with us: https://buildwithparallel.com/

🎥 NEW: Unlock MEMBERS-ONLY videos and behind-the-scenes drops 👉 / @dataslayermedia
🛠️ The exact tools and gear I trust (and actually use) 👉 https://amzn.to/44fKDv4 📡 Join the r/ModernRadio community for LoRa, Meshtastic, and off-grid tech builds 👉 / modernradio
💬 Get real-time help and connect with other builders on Discord 👉 / discord
📩 For sponsorships or business inquiries, reach out: macgyvertechnology@gmail.com 🧠 Need expert help fast? Book a 1:1 session and get unstuck today 👉 https://calendly.com/session-with-tim... AI-genereret videooversigt AI kan begå fejl, så sørg for at dobbelttjekke dens svar.

Data Slayer explores building a long-range, decentralized communication network by bridging digital data with amateur radio. Through open-source software and hardware, Data Slayer investigates how HF radio skywave propagation can connect communities across continents, bypassing traditional internet infrastructure while strictly adhering to amateur radio regulations and licensing requirements.

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=kS-CGkiPetQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS-CGkiPetQ

The math behind Google Maps. Sponsored by boot.dev - Click this link https://boot.dev/?promo=VERITASIUM and use our code VERITASIUM to get 25% off your first payment for boot.dev.

If you’re looking for a molecular modelling kit, try Snatoms, a kit I invented where the atoms snap together magnetically - https://ve42.co/SnatomsV

Sign up for the Veritasium newsletter for weekly science updates - https://ve42.co/Newsletter

For those curious about the path-count estimate: we estimated the non-backtracking paths NYC→SF, using a sparse spatial network model with mean degree ≈ 2.5 and characteristic length ≈ √N.

0:00 What is a ‘shortest path algorithm’? 3:30 Dijkstra’s 20 Minute Algorithm 6:30 The First Route Planner 10:31 A* Search Algorithm 12:40 Shortest Doesn’t Mean Fastest 15:08 Road Network Hierarchy 18:29 Mapping North America - Nested Dissection 25:17 How do map apps work? 28:04 Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability

Check out ‪@twoswap‬'s channel for some fantastic videos!

A big thank you to Ben Strasser and Julian Dibbelt who were incredibly gracious with their time and feedback.

Thank you to all the experts we interviewed for this video: Aaron Bernstein, Tim Roughgarden, Tomas Rokicki, Jon Kleinberg, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Peter Sanders, and the team behind the SSSP Barrier Paper: Xinkai Shu, Ran Duan, Xiao Mao, Longhui Yin, Jiayi Mao

For more information on how you choose A's heuristic, check out Polylog's video: • The hidden beauty of the A algorithm

If you'd like more information on Minecraft's A*, check out RedLogic's video: • Minecraft’s Smartest System Is Almost Comp...

References: https://ve42.co/DijkstraRefs

https://mastodon.social/@smarken/117304123745580295

Et nyt udkast til AI-hjemmelsloven er i høring frem til 5. oktober. Det giver offentlige myndigheder hjemmel til at bruge AI som beslutningsstøtte, men ikke til automatiske afgørelser.

Da jeg læste det, blev jeg mindet om et citat, Jacob Haugaard gav fra Folketingets talerstol i 1995: "Min personlige opfattelse er, at jeg må stå over for sådan en flok halvuvederhæftige lystløgnere."

Jeg vil ikke kalde nogen lystløgnere. Men lovforslaget hænger slet ikke sammen i praksis.

Udfordringen her er, at sagsbehandleren ifølge forslaget skal tage reel stilling til det forslag, AI-systemet kommer med.

Men ministeriet skriver selv, at kravet til den menneskelige involvering ikke er fastlagt klart. Logning og dokumentation af afvigelser nævnes i den forbindelse som gode redskaber, men de er ikke et krav.

Det er simpelthen for dårligt. Al erfaring viser at myndigheder gør det, de bliver pålagt - og ikke mere end det.

Selvfølgelig ikke. De har også en økonomi, der skal hænge sammen, og tekniske kontroller er dyre både at implementere og drifte.

Lad os antage, at lovforslaget går igennem. Hvad sker der så, når en afgørelse bliver påklaget og behandlet et halvt år senere?

Hvis der ikke er krav om logning, hvordan dokumenterer myndigheden så, at sagsbehandleren ikke bare kopierede AI-systemets forslag?

Min helt store anke er, at forslaget ser stort på al erfaring fra arbejdet med GDPR og NIS2... og den praktiske konsekvens deraf er at både kommunerne og styrelserne efterlades uden at vide, hvad der egentlig kræves af dem. Nåh ja, og at borgerne efterlades uden garantier for deres retssikkerhed. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7506394167342788608/

Søren Have: (mastodon)

“Fra danske politikere har vi gentagne gange hørt, at forpligtelserne over for F-35-partnerlandene har lagt Danmark i benlås, hvor overholdelse af folkeretten er en luksus, vi ikke har råd til.
… Jeg spekulerer på, om benlås-argumentet koster Danmark dyrere på vores renommé som folkeretsforkæmper, end en udtræden af Våbenhandelstraktaten ville gøre.”

https://mastodon.nu/@sorenhave/117302973910847847 med gavelink til artikel i dagbladet Information https://www.information.dk/moti/2026/09/danmarks-interesse-reducere-folkeretten-samling-hensigtserklaeringer?kupon=eyJpYXQiOjE3ODk5MDEyMjMsInN1YiI6IjExOTU3NDo4NDIyMTgifQ.dueRAMrYoRo2drFgq0uDvQ

Det er ikke i Danmarks interesse at reducere folkeretten til en samling hensigtserklæringer Vi må adskille ret fra ikkeret og insistere på, at den internationale retsorden ikke kun gælder, når det er politisk opportunt, skriver professor Astrid Kjeldgaard-Pedersen i dette essay

Skrevet af: Astrid Kjeldgaard-Pedersen Professor i folkeret ved Københavns Universitet

Resume af artiklen om folkerettens udfordringer og rekonstruktion (Mistral AI)

Forfatterens kernebudskab: Artiklen undersøger, hvordan folkeretten ofte afvises som ineffektiv eller irrelevant – en holdning, der kan spores tilbage til Victor Klemperers kritiske dagbogsnotat fra 1914, hvor han sammenlignede folkeretten med et "fugleskræmsel", ingen tager alvorligt. Forfatteren, Astrid Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, argumenterer dog for, at problemet ikke er folkerettens eksistens, men snarere manglen på kvalitet og konsistens i den juridiske analyse og argumentation, især i den offentlige debat.


🔍 Hovedpointer

1. Folkerettens legitimitet og kritik

  • Klemperers metafor (1914): Folkeretten opfattes som symbolsk og virkningsløs, fordi regler omgås eller ignoreres (f.eks. zeppelinerbombardementer af Antwerpen).
  • Moderne kritik: Eksempler som Ukraine, Gaza, Iran, Sudan og Vestsahara får mange til at afskrive den internationale retsorden som en "naiv fortælling" siden Anden Verdenskrig.
    • Årsager til skepsis:
    • Stærke stater undtager sig selv.
    • Asymmetrisk håndhævelse af regler.
    • Offer- og gerningsstatsstatus påvirker tolkningen.
  • Forfatterens ståsted: Kritiken er delvis berettiget, men konklusionen (at folkeretten er ubrugelig) er forkert.

2. Rekonstruktion af folkeretten: Reform eller revolution?

  • Konferencen "Reconstructing International Law" (2025):
    • Spørgsmål: Skal folkeretten reformeres eller revolutioneres?
    • Forfatterens bidrag: Først må vi blive enige om, hvad folkeretten er.
    • Udfordring: Tværfaglighed (jura, politologi, historie, sociologi) gør det svært at definere fælles grundlag.
    • Retsdogmatik (identifikation af gældende ret) bliver overset til fordel for bredere diskussioner.

📌 Fire danske eksempler på folkeretlig inkonsistens

Eksempel Problem Folkeretlig udfordring Danske reaktioner
1. Grønland (Trump-trusler) USA’s trusler om magtanvendelse mod Grønland (januar 2026). Overtrædelse af FN-pagtens artikel 2, stk. 4 (magtanvendelsesforbud). Klar afvisning: "Respekt for folkeretten er vores røde linje" (Lars Løkke Rasmussen).
2. Våbeneksport (F-35) Dansk deltagelse i F-35-program trods risiko for krigsforbrydelser. Våbenhandelstraktatens artikel 7: Forbyder eksport, hvis der er "overvejende risiko" for folkeretskrænkelser. Inkonsistent tolkning: Skift fra norsk/dansk linje (ingen afvejning) til britisk (sikkerhedsinteresser vejer tungere). Benlås-argument: "Vi har ikke råd til at overholde folkeretten".
3. Udvisning af kriminelle udlændinge Lovforslag om skærpede udvisningsregler (2026). EMRK artikel 8 (ret til familie- og privatliv) vs. samfundets sikkerhed. Politisk foregriben: Danmark antager, at EMD’s praksis vil ændre sig baseret på ikke-bindende erklæringer (fællesudtalelse, Chișinău-erklæringen). Problem: Udfordrer EMRK-systemets integritet.
4. Angrebet på Iran (februar 2026) USA/Israels angreb på Iran (krænkelse af magtanvendelsesforbud). Ingen retfærdiggørelse: Hverken humanitær intervention eller selvforsvar (artikel 51) var opfyldt. Tvetydighed: Løkke undgår at kalde det en krænkelse; forsvarsministeren kalder det en "klog beslutning".

Mønster: - Standhaftighed når danske interesser trues (Grønland). - Fleksibilitet når allierede (USA/Israel) eller sikkerhedsinteresser er involveret (Iran, våbeneksport). - Risiko: Undergraver Danmarks troværdighed og reducerer folkeretten til politisk opportunisme.


🎯 Forfatterens løsningsforslag

  1. Fokus på retsdogmatik:

    • Folkeretsjurister må skærpe metoden til at fastslå gældende ret.
    • Kvalitet i juridisk analyse > kortvarig effektivitet.
    • Eksempel: ICJ’s argumentationsstruktur er forblevet stabil, på trods af teoretiske udfordringer.
  2. Kritik af dansk debat:

    • Offentlig argumentation mangler ofte juridisk præcision.
    • Domme og lovgivning bør baseres på objektive, konsistente tolkninger – ikke politiske hensyn.
  3. Universiteters rolle:

    • Formidle retsdogmatisk metode til studerende, embedsmænd og politikere.
    • Fastholde skellet mellem ret og ikkeret, selv under pres.
  4. Langtidsperspektiv:

    • Folkerettens modstandskraft afhænger af metodisk disciplin, ikke af dens umiddelbare effektivitet.

💡 Konklusion

Folkeretten er ikke ubrugelig, men dens troværdighed afhænger af, at vi: ✅ Præcist definerer, hvad der er gældende ret. ✅ Anvender konsistente metoder i juridisk analyse. ✅ Undgår politisk farvning af folkeretlige spørgsmål. ✅ Insisterer på kvalitet – også når det er ubelejligt.

Revolution er ikke nødvendig; reform og metodisk stramning er.


Artiklen er baseret på et oplæg ved European Society of International Laws årskonference (2025).

Before we start checking who’s old enough to scroll, we should ask why scrolling is so hard to stop

EDRi skriver på Linkedin :

Age verification is having a moment in Brussels. But before we start checking who’s old enough to scroll, we should ask why scrolling is so hard to stop. Our member D3 has brought the first class-action lawsuits of their kind in the EU against Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube over what it describes as “addictive design”.

The cases challenge features such as infinite scrolling, autoplay, persistent notifications, personalised algorithmic recommendations and gamification, all designed to keep us engaged for longer

And yes, children and young people may be particularly vulnerable to these features, but the attention economy has all of us in its sights.

The EU must seize the opportunity to tackle the business models and design practices that exploit vulnerabilities and manipulate behaviour, rather than simply asking users, parents or children to navigate around them.

Age-gating an unsafe environment doesn’t make the environment safe. With the #DFA, EU lawmakers have an opportunity to build a digital space designed not to exploit anyone’s attention in the first place.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dfa-share-7505181538158919680-l3JB/


EDRi linker så til D3's egen side "D3 files the first class-action lawsuits in Europe over ‘addictive design’ against Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube"


Vigtige kommetarer (på Linkedin)

Jan Leindals :

There are already rules on age limits and the protection of children online. The problem is not a lack of rules, but a lack of enforcement.

ICCL makes another important point: it argues that Ireland, as EU Council President, should stay out of EU digital policy matters during its presidency due to a conflict of interest.

The biggest problem is a business model where users pay with their personal data, attention and behavioural data. This conflicts with the principles of the GDPR.

Age verification can give tech companies even more data, even though they can already estimate age from the many data points collected today.

The US shows that tech giants can face tough enforcement. Meta has reached a multibillion-dollar settlement with US states over allegations concerning the harmful effects of children and young people's use of Meta's platforms. At the same time, the US has required TikTok's US data to be handled under American control, strengthening US data sovereignty.

China has chosen a different model. TikTok does not exist as TikTok in the Chinese market and Meta's services are blocked.

The EU is losing more and more digital and data sovereignty. The six horsemen of the digital apocalypse are already here!

Joop B:

Age verification only treats the symptom but it doesn't tackle the underlying cause. Addictive platform design, endless scrolling and personalised feeds make social media apps so hard to put down. It affects both children and adults. High time we do something about the cause, not the effect.

European Digital Rights (EDRi):

Read our recommendations for an ambitious, far-reaching Digital Fairness Act that addresses the underlying platforms' architecture of manipulation and exploitation https://edri.org/our-work/breaking-the-extractive-digital-business-model-a-rights-based-digital-fairness-act/


Something is jamming GPS over Europe. Here's what we found By Veritasium

invidious-link https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=tz23G_UXCGA (Reklame-fri - Privacy-link)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz23G_UXCGA (Veritasium får views hvis du er logget ind og muligvis reklamepenge hvis du er logget ind)


Beskrivelse fra youtube

Special thanks to the experts and collaborators who made this video possible:

Professor Todd Humphreys and Dr Zach Clements at the University of Texas at Austin, whose research this story is based on - thank you for sharing your data, your time, and the inside story of the hunt.

Ramsey Faragher, Director of the Royal Institute of Navigation, for the brilliant interview, feedback and stories that helped to shape this video.

Richard D. Easton, for helping us understand the history of GPS.

Dana Goward, President of the Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation, for providing context on interference and alternative systems.

Richard Bowden and Luis Enrique Aguado from GMV for sharing their independent work tracing the source of the interference.

Ben Watts, for sharing his first-hand experience of GPS jamming and spoofing from the cockpit.

KeepTrack (https://keeptrack.space/) for generously giving us access to their satellite-tracking software, which we used to visualise the search through 15,000 satellites for the culprit. And to GPSWise (https://gpswise.aero/) for kindly providing their software which we used to visualise GPS jamming and spoofing.

Bartosz Ciechanowski, whose interactive GPS explainer (https://ciechanow.ski/gps/) was a great resource for research and the basis for one of our technical animations. Thank you for allowing us to build on your work.

▀▀▀ References:

Clements, Z. L., Kriezis, A., & Humphreys, T. E. (2026). Chasing Lightning: Detecting, Characterizing, and Identifying a Powerful Space-Based GNSS Interference - https://ve42.co/GNSSInterference

The rest here: https://ve42.co/GPSJammingRefs

▀▀▀ Special thanks to our Patreon supporters: Adam Foreman, Albert Wenger, Alex Porter, Alexander Tamas, André Powell, Anton Ragin, Balkrishna Heroor, Bertrand Serlet, Blake Byers, Bruce, Bryan Ackermann, Chris Brewer, Data Don, Dave Kircher, David Johnston, David Tseng, EJ Alexandra, Evgeny Skvortsov, Garrett Mueller, Gnare, gpoly, Hayden Christensen, Hong Thai Le, Ibby Hadeed, Jeromy Johnson, Jesse Brandsoy, Juan Benet, Kelcey Steele, KeyWestr, Kyi, Lee Redden, Marinus Kuivenhoven, Mark Heising, Martin Paull, Meekay, meg noah, Michael Krugman, Moebiusol - Cristian, Orlando Bassotto, Parsee Health, Paul Peijzel, Richard Sundvall, Robson, Sam Lutfi, Shalva Bukia, Sinan Taifour, Tj Steyn, Ubiquity Ventures, Vahe Andonians, wolfee

▀▀▀ Writer, Producer & Director: Emilia Gyles Presenters: Derek Muller & Gregor Čavlović Editor: Peter Nelson Asst. Editor & Sound Designer: James Stuart Animators: Domonkos Józsa, Emma Wright, Alex Drakoulis & Andrew Neet Illustrators: Jakub Misiek & Maria Gusakovich Stop Motion: Sulli Yost Researchers: Aakash Singh Bagga, Sophia Rose & Callum Cuttle Thumbnail Designers: Abdallah Rabah, Ren Hurley, Ben Powell & Daniel Ellacott Production Team: Jess Bishop-Laggett, Matthew Cavanagh & Anna Milkovic Executive Producers: Casper Mebius, Derek Muller & Gregor Čavlović

Additional video/photos supplied by Getty Images and Storyblocks Music from Epidemic Sound

AI-genereret videooversigt (youtube) Kvalitet og nøjagtighed kan variere.

Veritasium, Todd Humphreys and Zack Clemens investigate unexplained, continent-wide interference patterns affecting global satellite navigation systems. By analyzing high-resolution radio data, they explore the potential origins of these mysterious, repeated signal disruptions and the vulnerabilities inherent in the essential technology that powers modern logistics, transportation, and daily connectivity.


Yderligere links (Mitral AI - Mistral-søgning )

Her er en omfattende liste af kilder, der understøtter påstandene i Veritasium-videoen "Something is jamming GPS over Europe. Here's what we found". Kilderne er grupperet efter type og relevans for videoens centrale påstande: GPS-forstyrrelser i Europa, kilden (russiske satellitter), tekniske beviser og konsekvenser.




📄 Primære videnskabelige kilder & forskningspublikationer

(De mest autoritative kilder, der direkte underbygger videoens videnskabelige påstande)

1. Hovedforskningspapir: "Chasing Lightning"

  • "Chasing Lightning: Detecting, Characterizing, and Identifying a Powerful Space-Based GNSS Interference Source"
    • Forfattere: Zachary L. Clements (UT Austin), Argyris Kriezis (Stanford), Todd E. Humphreys (UT Austin)
    • Publiceret: 2. juni 2026 (arXiv preprint: arXiv:2606.03673)
    • Nøglefund:
    • 75 dage med kontinentdækkende GPS-forstyrrelser (2019–april 2026) over Europa, Grønland og Canada.
    • Forstyrrelserne varede 3–5 sekunder og ramte GPS L1-båndet (1575.42 MHz) med CNR-fald på op til 10 dB.
    • Kilden identificeret som russiske tidlige varslingssatellitter i Molniya-baner (f.eks. Cosmos 2546).
    • Forstyrrelserne opstod hovedsageligt på hverdage i arbejdstid (UTC), hvilket tyder på menneskelig involvering.
    • Spektralanalyse viste forstyrrelser centreret på 1577.5 MHz (2 MHz over GPS L1) og 1558.5 MHz.
    • Data fra 165 IGS-referencestationer (International GNSS Service) blev analyseret.
    • Læs papiret her Chasing Lightning: Detecting, Characterizing, and Identifying a Powerful Space-Based GNSS Interference Source

2. Konferencepublikation (2025)

  • "Transient Space-Based GNSS Interference: Observations and Analysis"
    • Forfattere: Zachary L. Clements & Todd E. Humphreys
    • Publiceret: September 2025 i Proceedings of the 38th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation
    • Nøglefund:
    • Præsenterede foreløbige resultater om 72 dage med GPS-forstyrrelser fra rummet (2019–2025).
    • Bekræftede, at forstyrrelserne stammede fra rummet (ikke jordbaserede kilder).
    • IOP Abstract Transient Space-Based GNSS Interference: Observations and Analysis

3. Teknisk rapport fra Radionavigation Laboratory (UT Austin)

  • "Russian Satellites Caught Jamming GPS in Europe"


📰 Nyhedsartikler & mediedækning

(Populærvidenskabelige og journalistiske kilder, der opsummerer forskningen)

1. Ars Technica

  • "Tests suggest Russian satellites can jam GPS on a continental scale"
    • Dato: Juni 2026
    • Nøglepunkter:
    • Forskerne analyserede data fra januar 2019 til april 2026 og fandt 75 dage med forstyrrelser.
    • Forstyrrelserne ramte GPS L1-båndet (1575.42 MHz) og opstod hovedsageligt tirsdag–torsdag i arbejdstid.
    • Kilden blev beregnet til at være mindst 1.200 km over Jorden (udelukker jordbaserede kilder).
    • Cosmos 2546 (russisk satellit) blev identificeret som en af kilderne.
    • Læs artiklen her *Tests suggest Russian satellites can jam GPS on a continental scale

2. Boing Boing

  • "A satellite has been jamming GPS over Europe"
    • Dato: 5. juni 2026
    • Nøglepunkter:
    • GPS-modtagere fra Svalbard til Spanien registrerede samtidige blackouts (3–5 sekunder).
    • Todd Humphreys og Zach Clements sporede kilden til Cosmos 2546 ved hjælp af rå data fra Amsterdam og Trondheim.
    • Forstyrrelserne opstod i arbejdstid, hvilket tyder på bevidst testning.
    • Læs artiklen her *A satellite has been jamming GPS over Europe

3. Sky News

---

4. AP News

  • "Russia's GPS jamming operation in Europe: Here's what to know"

---

5. Resilience Media

  • "Russia is jamming GPS from space"

---

6. GPS World

---

7. Universe Magazine

---

8. Science and Aerospace


---

🏛️ Officielle erklæringer & politiske reaktioner

1. EU-sanktioner mod GPS-jamming

---

2. US Space Command advarsel

  • Citeret i Ars Technica (juni 2026):
    • Leader of US Space Command advarede om, at Rusland har operativiseret antisatellitvåben, der kan målrette mod US-regeringssatellitter.
    • Kilde

---

🛠️ Tekniske værktøjer & datakilder

(Kilder, der understøtter videoens datavisualiseringer)

1. GPSwise

  • Brugt i Veritasium-videoen til at visualisere GPS-jamming og spoofing.
  • Firma: GPSwise (specialiseret i GNSS-interferensovervågning).
  • Nøglepunkter:

---

2. International GNSS Service (IGS)

  • Data fra 165 referencestationer blev brugt i forskningen.
  • Hjemmeside: https://igs.org
  • Nøglepunkter:
    • Højfrekvente (1 Hz) GNSS-data fra stationer i Europa, Grønland og Canada.
    • Data er offentligt tilgængelige via Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (CDDIS) (NASA).

---

📊 Samlet oversigt over nøglefakta fra kilderne

Påstand i videoen Understøttende kilder Bevisniveau
GPS-forstyrrelser i Europa arXiv-papir, Ars Technica, Boing Boing ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Højt)
Kilden er russiske satellitter arXiv-papir, RNL, GPS World ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Højt)
Forstyrrelser varer 3–5 sekunder arXiv-papir, Boing Boing ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Højt)
Forstyrrelser i GPS L1-båndet arXiv-papir, Ars Technica ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Højt)
75 dage med forstyrrelser (2019–2026) arXiv-papir, Universe Magazine ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Højt)
Cosmos 2546 som kilde Boing Boing, Resilience Media ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Højt)
Forstyrrelser i arbejdstid arXiv-papir, Ars Technica ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Højt)
Molniya-baner som kilde arXiv-papir, GPS World ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Højt)
EU-sanktioner mod GPS-jamming Militarnyi ⭐⭐⭐ (Middel)
Moskvas benægtelse Sky News ⭐⭐ (Lavt)


🔍 Hvordan kilderne understøtter videoen

  1. Videnskabelig validering:

    • arXiv-papiret og konferencepublikationerne fra Todd Humphreys og Zach Clements er primærkilderne, der direkte underbygger videoens videnskabelige påstande.
    • RNL (Radionavigation Laboratory) og US Air Force har bekræftet forskningen.
  2. Tekniske beviser:

    • GPSwise blev brugt i videoen til at visualisere forstyrrelserne (nævnt i GPSwise-bloggen).
    • IGS-data (165 stationer) blev analyseret for at spore kilden.
  3. Mediedækning:

    • Ars Technica, Boing Boing, Sky News, AP News opsummerer forskningen for et bredere publikum.
  4. Politiske reaktioner:

    • EU-sanktioner og US Space Command-advarsler viser, at problemet tages alvorligt på politisk plan.

---

📌 Anbefalede kilder at starte med

Hvis du vil dybdegående forstå emnet, anbefaler jeg at starte med: 1. arXiv-papiret "Chasing Lightning" (den mest detaljerede kilde). 2. Ars Technica-artiklen (god opsummering). 3. RNL's udtalelse (bekræftelse fra forskerne).