“They need trillions of dollars in revenue. Who’s going to pay it?”

Senior Distinguished Fellow at the Center for Economic and Policy Research Dean Baker joins The Tech Report’s Isaac Pound to talk about how some of the founding principles of the AI industry are now in question after business leaders admit they’re not using frontier models.

Comments:

@teamspeak9374 for 18 timer siden On one side you got highly credited independent economists, journalists and researchers saying the economics makes no sense. On the other side you have a bunch of tech bros saying to close your eyes to reality cause AI will fix it. I wonder who's more credible 🤔 579 Svar 71 svar @15tt-b3h for 17 timer siden This will be the third major global economic bubble to affect my adult life. What a time to be alive! 343 Svar 36 svar @joemclemore3503 for 17 timer siden It will be a cold day in hell when I turn over any of my personal dealings the Meta's "agent" muse. It's malware/spyware on freakin' steroids. 193 Svar 8 svar @arandmorgan for 15 timer siden Do you mean, due to their extreme wealth and power they suffered so much from the isolation away from normal people, that their disconnect led to them providing a service or product that nobody wants. Who could have thought that? 37 Svar 2 svar @georgemcbay for 12 timer siden Mike Ehrmantraut from Breaking Bad knows a lot about the economics of AI. 12 Svar @tomryan3012 for 18 timer siden Salesforce bet the company on their AI product ‘Agentforce’, they were even going to rename Salesforce to Agentforce. It failed so badly that they’ve backtracked and teamed up with Anthropic, rebranding to AIforce.

Internally, salespeople are struggling to sell AI tooling. Credit consumption models are a CFO’s nightmare

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=yGVdI0C_2Ro https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGVdI0C_2Ro

The Linux Lighthouse, your guide to Linux

Welcome to The Linux Lighthouse, Your openSUSE Linux Guide! In this video, we'll dive deep into systemd, the core of system and service management on Linux. If you're using openSUSE Linux, this guide is for you! We'll cover everything you need to know about systemd-from basic commands for managing services to advanced customizations with unit files, snapshots, and timers. Learn how to control your system's startup, schedule jobs like a pro with systemd timers, and debug services using journalctl. With clear examples and step-by-step instructions, this is your ultimate guide to mastering systemd on openSUSE Leap!

What You'll Learn:

Understanding systemd and its advantages
Essential systemctl commands for managing services
Switching and configuring targets (runlevels)
Customizing systemd with unit files
Creating system snapshots for safe rollbacks (deprecated)
Scheduling tasks with systemd timers
Managing temporary directories and cleaning them automatically
Monitoring logs and debugging with journalctl

Whether you're a beginner or a sysadmin, this video will give you the tools to take control of your openSUSE Linux system. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the bell icon to get notified about new Linux tutorials!

🔗 Resources:

Official systemd Documentation: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Soft...


openSUSE Reference Manual: Official systemd Documentation: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Soft...

Online Shop US - https://the-linux-lighthouse.myspread... Online Shop EU - https://the-linux-lighthouse.myspread... Buy Me a coffee ☕️: https://buymeacoffee.com/thelinuxligh...

Linux #systemd #openSUSE #LinuxTutorial #openSUSELeap #opensusetumbleweed #SystemManagement #LinuxForBeginners #LinuxAdministration #TechTutorial #LinuxCommands #openSUSELinux #ITTraining #LearnLinux #linuxtutorial #tech

AI-genereret videooversigt AI kan begå fejl, så sørg for at dobbelttjekke dens svar.

The Linux Lighthouse explores systemd, the Linux initialization and service manager. The guide details how to use systemctl for process management, configure custom unit files, schedule tasks with timers, automate temporary file cleanup, and monitor logs using journalctl on openSUSE.

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=l6ZcFa8pybE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6ZcFa8pybE

How did we go from digital computers to AI seemingly everywhere? Neil deGrasse Tyson, Chuck Nice, & Gary O’Reilly dive into the mechanics of thinking, how AI got its start, and what deep learning really means with cognitive and computer scientist, Nobel Laureate, and one of the architects of AI, Geoffrey Hinton.

Hinton explains the fundamental shift from logic-based rule programming to the biological approach: building systems that learn the way a brain does. Learn about the history of computer science that led to the breakthroughs we have today. We break down the structure of artificial neural networks and the meaning of AI buzzwords like “deep learning” really mean. You’ll learn about the layering of data processing and how the first layer of neurons might detect a simple edge, the second a beak, and the third a bird’s head.

Hinton explains the light bulb moment of backpropagation, the mathematical breakthrough using calculus to send force backward to strengthen previous connections. Is this a process we share with neural nets? We discuss whether AI thinks like us and explore why AlphaGo succeeded in beating us at our own game by generating its own data and whether LLMs will hit a ceiling as they run out of human-written text. Can AI reason? What does it mean for something or someone to think?

As the science turns toward the future, we tackle heavy questions regarding the massive energy demands of data centers and whether AI can reinvent solar technology to save itself. Hinton discusses the "Volkswagen Effect," where a model might strategically underperform to avoid being unplugged. We dive into consciousness to ask if subjective experience is just a byproduct of complex perception and if chatbots already possess it. What are the upsides as well as the downsides? The singularity isn’t imminent yet... but the "yet" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

Thanks to our Patrons Kylie Jonasson, Bryan Pfeifer, Anton Couzens, Brad Smith, Jeffdrumseitz, Richard Vaughan, sSHEScience©, Ben Mondoux, Julien Ballez, Tom, Matteo Berlanda, Dr. Cool Young Booger Results Murray, Shawndra Hill, Mike Easter, Charles Shields, Xander-Tony Kehr, Chase Busha, Leah, Justin Harris, Stephen Schultz, Jason West, ImaPerson, Argie Weatherington, Ted Barnett, MD, Lizzie O'Grady, Kimja, Paul Baltatescu, Hanna Cantley, Bill Hoffman, FreddieAbdon, Trish, Muath, Timeless Angel, Dxly, Michael Fuery, Tom Hadrava, Guy Eran, Max Murphy, Cristy Nourash, Donita Buchheit, Kel, Screaming Firehawk, Patricia Churchland, Mikael Stenberg, Dale Duncan, Ghostpacho, Nathan Lehenbauer, James Schaedler, Andrew G, Samuel Sladkovský, Punished Leno, Chris L, George Papura, Miguel Basto, Brittney Starkey, David Rouisse, WTFbro Podcast, Marvin, Jason Driscoll, Yasyoc, Donte Jones, Trevor, Andrew, Jared Harrison, Terence Garrod, TheCrassDragon, Daithon Brown, Perkins, Brendan Gost, Daria Shkrabachenko, Tania Cortes Alonso, JD, Jacob Westman, Lacey Rae Castleberry, Isaac Castrillo, Eric Bouliane, Tim The Secular Humanist, João Sampaio, Aegor, Evan Schreier, Amanda Burris, Allen Arthur, Vikas Jain, Jeroen Wilms, Nathan Schepker, Sverre Moe, Ruth Crisp, Legend Omega, B Dubbz, Jay Youmans, Nite Stalker, Adrian Hungate, Marguerite Nesfield, Michael Engelman, Scott Donner, Diamir Elliott, Warsame Giuled, Kansas Dan, Rey Pierantoni, and Rick Servello for supporting us this week.

Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction: Geoffrey Hinton 03:00 - Approaches to Make and Intelligent System 07:19 - How Artificial Neural Nets Work 14:12 - Making a Neural Net By Hand 24:41 - Backpropigation Breakthrough 33:44 - Why AI Seemed to Arrive So Fast 34:39 - What is Thinking? 37:50 - Is AI Better at Learning? 47:41 - Can We Humanize AI? 50:58 - Setting Up Guardrails 54:04 - Is AI Lying to Us? 58:47 - Will AI Be the End of Us All? 01:00:51 - Does AI Hallucinate? 01:04:36 - The Upside 01:08:13 - Will AI Create More AI? 01:10:17 - AI Nuclear Winter: Will We Unite? 01:15:10 - 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics 01:16:44 - The Price of Replacing All the Jobs 01:22:50 - Achieving Consciousness 01:28:37 - The Work to Be Done Before the Singularity

Check out our second channel, @StarTalkPlus

Get the NEW StarTalk book, 'To Infinity and Beyond: A Journey of Cosmic Discovery' on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3PL0NFn Support us on Patreon: / startalkradio

FOLLOW or SUBSCRIBE to StarTalk: Twitter: / startalkradio
Facebook: / startalk
Instagram: / startalk

StarTalk #NeildeGrasseTyson

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=5vbl5FL-nsI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vbl5FL-nsI

1,600 Miles with this...

I spent three weeks trying to bridge Reticulum onto HF so two people could pass a real message hundreds of miles with no cell tower, no Starlink, and nobody in the middle charging a toll. The radio is a Hermes Lite 2. The hard part isn’t only the physics — U.S. amateur rules also forbid hiding the meaning of a message on these bands, so whatever goes over the air has to be legal. This is an attempt to build an open-source internet we actually own, using the sky as the hop.

Parallel Primer — the course for how the hardware, radios, and software fit together:
👉 https://buildwithparallel.com/product...

Haven — the node I use in the field:
👉 https://buildwithparallel.com/product...

CrossTalk: Reticulum Workbench https://github.com/buildwithparallel/...

Build the open-source internet with us: https://buildwithparallel.com/

🎥 NEW: Unlock MEMBERS-ONLY videos and behind-the-scenes drops 👉 / @dataslayermedia
🛠️ The exact tools and gear I trust (and actually use) 👉 https://amzn.to/44fKDv4 📡 Join the r/ModernRadio community for LoRa, Meshtastic, and off-grid tech builds 👉 / modernradio
💬 Get real-time help and connect with other builders on Discord 👉 / discord
📩 For sponsorships or business inquiries, reach out: macgyvertechnology@gmail.com 🧠 Need expert help fast? Book a 1:1 session and get unstuck today 👉 https://calendly.com/session-with-tim... AI-genereret videooversigt AI kan begå fejl, så sørg for at dobbelttjekke dens svar.

Data Slayer explores building a long-range, decentralized communication network by bridging digital data with amateur radio. Through open-source software and hardware, Data Slayer investigates how HF radio skywave propagation can connect communities across continents, bypassing traditional internet infrastructure while strictly adhering to amateur radio regulations and licensing requirements.

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=kS-CGkiPetQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS-CGkiPetQ

The math behind Google Maps. Sponsored by boot.dev - Click this link https://boot.dev/?promo=VERITASIUM and use our code VERITASIUM to get 25% off your first payment for boot.dev.

If you’re looking for a molecular modelling kit, try Snatoms, a kit I invented where the atoms snap together magnetically - https://ve42.co/SnatomsV

Sign up for the Veritasium newsletter for weekly science updates - https://ve42.co/Newsletter

For those curious about the path-count estimate: we estimated the non-backtracking paths NYC→SF, using a sparse spatial network model with mean degree ≈ 2.5 and characteristic length ≈ √N.

0:00 What is a ‘shortest path algorithm’? 3:30 Dijkstra’s 20 Minute Algorithm 6:30 The First Route Planner 10:31 A* Search Algorithm 12:40 Shortest Doesn’t Mean Fastest 15:08 Road Network Hierarchy 18:29 Mapping North America - Nested Dissection 25:17 How do map apps work? 28:04 Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability

Check out ‪@twoswap‬'s channel for some fantastic videos!

A big thank you to Ben Strasser and Julian Dibbelt who were incredibly gracious with their time and feedback.

Thank you to all the experts we interviewed for this video: Aaron Bernstein, Tim Roughgarden, Tomas Rokicki, Jon Kleinberg, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Peter Sanders, and the team behind the SSSP Barrier Paper: Xinkai Shu, Ran Duan, Xiao Mao, Longhui Yin, Jiayi Mao

For more information on how you choose A's heuristic, check out Polylog's video: • The hidden beauty of the A algorithm

If you'd like more information on Minecraft's A*, check out RedLogic's video: • Minecraft’s Smartest System Is Almost Comp...

References: https://ve42.co/DijkstraRefs

https://mastodon.social/@smarken/117304123745580295

Et nyt udkast til AI-hjemmelsloven er i høring frem til 5. oktober. Det giver offentlige myndigheder hjemmel til at bruge AI som beslutningsstøtte, men ikke til automatiske afgørelser.

Da jeg læste det, blev jeg mindet om et citat, Jacob Haugaard gav fra Folketingets talerstol i 1995: "Min personlige opfattelse er, at jeg må stå over for sådan en flok halvuvederhæftige lystløgnere."

Jeg vil ikke kalde nogen lystløgnere. Men lovforslaget hænger slet ikke sammen i praksis.

Udfordringen her er, at sagsbehandleren ifølge forslaget skal tage reel stilling til det forslag, AI-systemet kommer med.

Men ministeriet skriver selv, at kravet til den menneskelige involvering ikke er fastlagt klart. Logning og dokumentation af afvigelser nævnes i den forbindelse som gode redskaber, men de er ikke et krav.

Det er simpelthen for dårligt. Al erfaring viser at myndigheder gør det, de bliver pålagt - og ikke mere end det.

Selvfølgelig ikke. De har også en økonomi, der skal hænge sammen, og tekniske kontroller er dyre både at implementere og drifte.

Lad os antage, at lovforslaget går igennem. Hvad sker der så, når en afgørelse bliver påklaget og behandlet et halvt år senere?

Hvis der ikke er krav om logning, hvordan dokumenterer myndigheden så, at sagsbehandleren ikke bare kopierede AI-systemets forslag?

Min helt store anke er, at forslaget ser stort på al erfaring fra arbejdet med GDPR og NIS2... og den praktiske konsekvens deraf er at både kommunerne og styrelserne efterlades uden at vide, hvad der egentlig kræves af dem. Nåh ja, og at borgerne efterlades uden garantier for deres retssikkerhed. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7506394167342788608/

Søren Have: (mastodon)

“Fra danske politikere har vi gentagne gange hørt, at forpligtelserne over for F-35-partnerlandene har lagt Danmark i benlås, hvor overholdelse af folkeretten er en luksus, vi ikke har råd til.
… Jeg spekulerer på, om benlås-argumentet koster Danmark dyrere på vores renommé som folkeretsforkæmper, end en udtræden af Våbenhandelstraktaten ville gøre.”

https://mastodon.nu/@sorenhave/117302973910847847 med gavelink til artikel i dagbladet Information https://www.information.dk/moti/2026/09/danmarks-interesse-reducere-folkeretten-samling-hensigtserklaeringer?kupon=eyJpYXQiOjE3ODk5MDEyMjMsInN1YiI6IjExOTU3NDo4NDIyMTgifQ.dueRAMrYoRo2drFgq0uDvQ

Det er ikke i Danmarks interesse at reducere folkeretten til en samling hensigtserklæringer Vi må adskille ret fra ikkeret og insistere på, at den internationale retsorden ikke kun gælder, når det er politisk opportunt, skriver professor Astrid Kjeldgaard-Pedersen i dette essay

Skrevet af: Astrid Kjeldgaard-Pedersen Professor i folkeret ved Københavns Universitet

Resume af artiklen om folkerettens udfordringer og rekonstruktion (Mistral AI)

Forfatterens kernebudskab: Artiklen undersøger, hvordan folkeretten ofte afvises som ineffektiv eller irrelevant – en holdning, der kan spores tilbage til Victor Klemperers kritiske dagbogsnotat fra 1914, hvor han sammenlignede folkeretten med et "fugleskræmsel", ingen tager alvorligt. Forfatteren, Astrid Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, argumenterer dog for, at problemet ikke er folkerettens eksistens, men snarere manglen på kvalitet og konsistens i den juridiske analyse og argumentation, især i den offentlige debat.

🔍 Hovedpointer

1. Folkerettens legitimitet og kritik

• Klemperers metafor (1914): Folkeretten opfattes som symbolsk og virkningsløs, fordi regler omgås eller ignoreres (f.eks. zeppelinerbombardementer af Antwerpen).
• Moderne kritik: Eksempler som Ukraine, Gaza, Iran, Sudan og Vestsahara får mange til at afskrive den internationale retsorden som en "naiv fortælling" siden Anden Verdenskrig.
  • Årsager til skepsis:
  • Stærke stater undtager sig selv.
  • Asymmetrisk håndhævelse af regler.
  • Offer- og gerningsstatsstatus påvirker tolkningen.
• Forfatterens ståsted: Kritiken er delvis berettiget, men konklusionen (at folkeretten er ubrugelig) er forkert.

2. Rekonstruktion af folkeretten: Reform eller revolution?

• Konferencen "Reconstructing International Law" (2025):
  • Spørgsmål: Skal folkeretten reformeres eller revolutioneres?
  • Forfatterens bidrag: Først må vi blive enige om, hvad folkeretten er.
  • Udfordring: Tværfaglighed (jura, politologi, historie, sociologi) gør det svært at definere fælles grundlag.
  • Retsdogmatik (identifikation af gældende ret) bliver overset til fordel for bredere diskussioner.

📌 Fire danske eksempler på folkeretlig inkonsistens

Mønster: - Standhaftighed når danske interesser trues (Grønland). - Fleksibilitet når allierede (USA/Israel) eller sikkerhedsinteresser er involveret (Iran, våbeneksport). - Risiko: Undergraver Danmarks troværdighed og reducerer folkeretten til politisk opportunisme.

🎯 Forfatterens løsningsforslag

1. Fokus på retsdogmatik:

   • Folkeretsjurister må skærpe metoden til at fastslå gældende ret.
   • Kvalitet i juridisk analyse > kortvarig effektivitet.
   • Eksempel: ICJ’s argumentationsstruktur er forblevet stabil, på trods af teoretiske udfordringer.

2. Kritik af dansk debat:

   • Offentlig argumentation mangler ofte juridisk præcision.
   • Domme og lovgivning bør baseres på objektive, konsistente tolkninger – ikke politiske hensyn.

3. Universiteters rolle:

   • Formidle retsdogmatisk metode til studerende, embedsmænd og politikere.
   • Fastholde skellet mellem ret og ikkeret, selv under pres.

4. Langtidsperspektiv:

   • Folkerettens modstandskraft afhænger af metodisk disciplin, ikke af dens umiddelbare effektivitet.

💡 Konklusion

Folkeretten er ikke ubrugelig, men dens troværdighed afhænger af, at vi: ✅ Præcist definerer, hvad der er gældende ret. ✅ Anvender konsistente metoder i juridisk analyse. ✅ Undgår politisk farvning af folkeretlige spørgsmål. ✅ Insisterer på kvalitet – også når det er ubelejligt.

Revolution er ikke nødvendig; reform og metodisk stramning er.

Artiklen er baseret på et oplæg ved European Society of International Laws årskonference (2025).

Before we start checking who’s old enough to scroll, we should ask why scrolling is so hard to stop

EDRi skriver på Linkedin :

Age verification is having a moment in Brussels. But before we start checking who’s old enough to scroll, we should ask why scrolling is so hard to stop. Our member D3 has brought the first class-action lawsuits of their kind in the EU against Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube over what it describes as “addictive design”.

The cases challenge features such as infinite scrolling, autoplay, persistent notifications, personalised algorithmic recommendations and gamification, all designed to keep us engaged for longer

And yes, children and young people may be particularly vulnerable to these features, but the attention economy has all of us in its sights.

The EU must seize the opportunity to tackle the business models and design practices that exploit vulnerabilities and manipulate behaviour, rather than simply asking users, parents or children to navigate around them.

Age-gating an unsafe environment doesn’t make the environment safe. With the #DFA, EU lawmakers have an opportunity to build a digital space designed not to exploit anyone’s attention in the first place.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dfa-share-7505181538158919680-l3JB/

EDRi linker så til D3's egen side "D3 files the first class-action lawsuits in Europe over ‘addictive design’ against Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube"

Vigtige kommetarer (på Linkedin)

Jan Leindals :

There are already rules on age limits and the protection of children online. The problem is not a lack of rules, but a lack of enforcement.

ICCL makes another important point: it argues that Ireland, as EU Council President, should stay out of EU digital policy matters during its presidency due to a conflict of interest.

The biggest problem is a business model where users pay with their personal data, attention and behavioural data. This conflicts with the principles of the GDPR.

Age verification can give tech companies even more data, even though they can already estimate age from the many data points collected today.

The US shows that tech giants can face tough enforcement. Meta has reached a multibillion-dollar settlement with US states over allegations concerning the harmful effects of children and young people's use of Meta's platforms. At the same time, the US has required TikTok's US data to be handled under American control, strengthening US data sovereignty.

China has chosen a different model. TikTok does not exist as TikTok in the Chinese market and Meta's services are blocked.

The EU is losing more and more digital and data sovereignty. The six horsemen of the digital apocalypse are already here!

Joop B:

Age verification only treats the symptom but it doesn't tackle the underlying cause. Addictive platform design, endless scrolling and personalised feeds make social media apps so hard to put down. It affects both children and adults. High time we do something about the cause, not the effect.

European Digital Rights (EDRi):

Read our recommendations for an ambitious, far-reaching Digital Fairness Act that addresses the underlying platforms' architecture of manipulation and exploitation https://edri.org/our-work/breaking-the-extractive-digital-business-model-a-rights-based-digital-fairness-act/

Something is jamming GPS over Europe. Here's what we found By Veritasium

invidious-link https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=tz23G_UXCGA (Reklame-fri - Privacy-link)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz23G_UXCGA (Veritasium får views hvis du er logget ind og muligvis reklamepenge hvis du er logget ind)

Beskrivelse fra youtube

Special thanks to the experts and collaborators who made this video possible:

Professor Todd Humphreys and Dr Zach Clements at the University of Texas at Austin, whose research this story is based on - thank you for sharing your data, your time, and the inside story of the hunt.

Ramsey Faragher, Director of the Royal Institute of Navigation, for the brilliant interview, feedback and stories that helped to shape this video.

Richard D. Easton, for helping us understand the history of GPS.

Dana Goward, President of the Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation, for providing context on interference and alternative systems.

Richard Bowden and Luis Enrique Aguado from GMV for sharing their independent work tracing the source of the interference.

Ben Watts, for sharing his first-hand experience of GPS jamming and spoofing from the cockpit.

KeepTrack (https://keeptrack.space/) for generously giving us access to their satellite-tracking software, which we used to visualise the search through 15,000 satellites for the culprit. And to GPSWise (https://gpswise.aero/) for kindly providing their software which we used to visualise GPS jamming and spoofing.

Bartosz Ciechanowski, whose interactive GPS explainer (https://ciechanow.ski/gps/) was a great resource for research and the basis for one of our technical animations. Thank you for allowing us to build on your work.

▀▀▀ References:

Clements, Z. L., Kriezis, A., & Humphreys, T. E. (2026). Chasing Lightning: Detecting, Characterizing, and Identifying a Powerful Space-Based GNSS Interference - https://ve42.co/GNSSInterference

The rest here: https://ve42.co/GPSJammingRefs

▀▀▀ Special thanks to our Patreon supporters: Adam Foreman, Albert Wenger, Alex Porter, Alexander Tamas, André Powell, Anton Ragin, Balkrishna Heroor, Bertrand Serlet, Blake Byers, Bruce, Bryan Ackermann, Chris Brewer, Data Don, Dave Kircher, David Johnston, David Tseng, EJ Alexandra, Evgeny Skvortsov, Garrett Mueller, Gnare, gpoly, Hayden Christensen, Hong Thai Le, Ibby Hadeed, Jeromy Johnson, Jesse Brandsoy, Juan Benet, Kelcey Steele, KeyWestr, Kyi, Lee Redden, Marinus Kuivenhoven, Mark Heising, Martin Paull, Meekay, meg noah, Michael Krugman, Moebiusol - Cristian, Orlando Bassotto, Parsee Health, Paul Peijzel, Richard Sundvall, Robson, Sam Lutfi, Shalva Bukia, Sinan Taifour, Tj Steyn, Ubiquity Ventures, Vahe Andonians, wolfee

▀▀▀ Writer, Producer & Director: Emilia Gyles Presenters: Derek Muller & Gregor Čavlović Editor: Peter Nelson Asst. Editor & Sound Designer: James Stuart Animators: Domonkos Józsa, Emma Wright, Alex Drakoulis & Andrew Neet Illustrators: Jakub Misiek & Maria Gusakovich Stop Motion: Sulli Yost Researchers: Aakash Singh Bagga, Sophia Rose & Callum Cuttle Thumbnail Designers: Abdallah Rabah, Ren Hurley, Ben Powell & Daniel Ellacott Production Team: Jess Bishop-Laggett, Matthew Cavanagh & Anna Milkovic Executive Producers: Casper Mebius, Derek Muller & Gregor Čavlović

Additional video/photos supplied by Getty Images and Storyblocks Music from Epidemic Sound

AI-genereret videooversigt (youtube) Kvalitet og nøjagtighed kan variere.

Veritasium, Todd Humphreys and Zack Clemens investigate unexplained, continent-wide interference patterns affecting global satellite navigation systems. By analyzing high-resolution radio data, they explore the potential origins of these mysterious, repeated signal disruptions and the vulnerabilities inherent in the essential technology that powers modern logistics, transportation, and daily connectivity.

Yderligere links (Mitral AI - Mistral-søgning )

Her er en omfattende liste af kilder, der understøtter påstandene i Veritasium-videoen "Something is jamming GPS over Europe. Here's what we found". Kilderne er grupperet efter type og relevans for videoens centrale påstande: GPS-forstyrrelser i Europa, kilden (russiske satellitter), tekniske beviser og konsekvenser.

📄 Primære videnskabelige kilder & forskningspublikationer

(De mest autoritative kilder, der direkte underbygger videoens videnskabelige påstande)

1. Hovedforskningspapir: "Chasing Lightning"

• "Chasing Lightning: Detecting, Characterizing, and Identifying a Powerful Space-Based GNSS Interference Source"
  • Forfattere: Zachary L. Clements (UT Austin), Argyris Kriezis (Stanford), Todd E. Humphreys (UT Austin)
  • Publiceret: 2. juni 2026 (arXiv preprint: arXiv:2606.03673)
  • Nøglefund:
  • 75 dage med kontinentdækkende GPS-forstyrrelser (2019–april 2026) over Europa, Grønland og Canada.
  • Forstyrrelserne varede 3–5 sekunder og ramte GPS L1-båndet (1575.42 MHz) med CNR-fald på op til 10 dB.
  • Kilden identificeret som russiske tidlige varslingssatellitter i Molniya-baner (f.eks. Cosmos 2546).
  • Forstyrrelserne opstod hovedsageligt på hverdage i arbejdstid (UTC), hvilket tyder på menneskelig involvering.
  • Spektralanalyse viste forstyrrelser centreret på 1577.5 MHz (2 MHz over GPS L1) og 1558.5 MHz.
  • Data fra 165 IGS-referencestationer (International GNSS Service) blev analyseret.
  • Læs papiret her Chasing Lightning: Detecting, Characterizing, and Identifying a Powerful Space-Based GNSS Interference Source

2. Konferencepublikation (2025)

• "Transient Space-Based GNSS Interference: Observations and Analysis"
  • Forfattere: Zachary L. Clements & Todd E. Humphreys
  • Publiceret: September 2025 i Proceedings of the 38th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation
  • Nøglefund:
  • Præsenterede foreløbige resultater om 72 dage med GPS-forstyrrelser fra rummet (2019–2025).
  • Bekræftede, at forstyrrelserne stammede fra rummet (ikke jordbaserede kilder).
  • IOP Abstract Transient Space-Based GNSS Interference: Observations and Analysis

3. Teknisk rapport fra Radionavigation Laboratory (UT Austin)

• "Russian Satellites Caught Jamming GPS in Europe"
  • Udgivet: Juni 2026
  • Nøglefund:
  • Bekræftet af US Air Force og spansk firma GMV.
  • EKS-satellitterne (russisk tidlig varslingssystem) identificeret som ansvarlige for sekundlange GPS-blackouts siden 2019.
  • Læs her *Russian Satellites Caught Jamming GPS in Europe

📰 Nyhedsartikler & mediedækning

(Populærvidenskabelige og journalistiske kilder, der opsummerer forskningen)

1. Ars Technica

• "Tests suggest Russian satellites can jam GPS on a continental scale"
  • Dato: Juni 2026
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • Forskerne analyserede data fra januar 2019 til april 2026 og fandt 75 dage med forstyrrelser.
  • Forstyrrelserne ramte GPS L1-båndet (1575.42 MHz) og opstod hovedsageligt tirsdag–torsdag i arbejdstid.
  • Kilden blev beregnet til at være mindst 1.200 km over Jorden (udelukker jordbaserede kilder).
  • Cosmos 2546 (russisk satellit) blev identificeret som en af kilderne.
  • Læs artiklen her *Tests suggest Russian satellites can jam GPS on a continental scale

2. Boing Boing

• "A satellite has been jamming GPS over Europe"
  • Dato: 5. juni 2026
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • GPS-modtagere fra Svalbard til Spanien registrerede samtidige blackouts (3–5 sekunder).
  • Todd Humphreys og Zach Clements sporede kilden til Cosmos 2546 ved hjælp af rå data fra Amsterdam og Trondheim.
  • Forstyrrelserne opstod i arbejdstid, hvilket tyder på bevidst testning.
  • Læs artiklen her *A satellite has been jamming GPS over Europe

3. Sky News

• "Russian satellites have been causing GPS disruption across Europe, scientists claim"
  • Dato: 2026
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • Moskva har benægtet at stå bag GPS-jamming (officiel russisk holdning).
  • GPS-jamming er blevet en rutineforstyrrelse i Europa, især i Baltikum.
  • Læs artiklen her *Russian satellites have been causing GPS disruption across Europe

---

4. AP News

• "Russia's GPS jamming operation in Europe: Here's what to know"
  • Dato: 2026
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • GPS-jamming er blevet så almindeligt, at myndigheder (f.eks. Bulgarien) ikke længere undersøger enkeltstående hændelser.
  • Forstyrrelserne påvirker civil luftfart og skibsfart.
  • Læs artiklen her *Russia's GPS jamming operation in Europe

---

5. Resilience Media

• "Russia is jamming GPS from space"
  • Dato: 2026
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • 165 referencestationer i Europa, Grønland og Canada blev analyseret.
  • EKS-satellitterne (russisk system) var i passende position til at forårsage forstyrrelserne.
  • Læs artiklen her *Russia is jamming GPS from space

---

6. GPS World

• "Todd Humphreys: Russian satellites a cause of GNSS jamming across Europe"
  • Dato: Juni 2026
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • Papiret "Chasing Lightning" bekræfter, at russiske satellitter i Molniya-baner forårsager forstyrrelserne.
  • Læs artiklen her *Todd Humphreys: Russian satellites a cause of GNSS jamming across Europe

---

7. Universe Magazine

• "Russian satellites may jam GPS signals over Europe"
  • Dato: 2026
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • 75 dage med forstyrrelser (2019–april 2026) bekræftet.
  • 5 meter præcision i lokalisering af kilden ved hjælp af tidsforskelmålinger (TDOA).
  • Læs artiklen her *Russian satellites may jam GPS signals over Europe

---

8. Science and Aerospace

• "Russia is jamming GPS from space"
  • Dato: 2026
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • 75 forstyrrelser med CNR-fald på 5 dB eller mere (2019–2026).
  • Cosmos 2546 og andre EKS-satellitter identificeret som kilder.
  • Læs artiklen her *Russia is jamming GPS from space

---

🏛️ Officielle erklæringer & politiske reaktioner

1. EU-sanktioner mod GPS-jamming

• "Europe Announces Sanctions Over GPS Jamming in the Baltics"
  • Dato: 2025
  • Nøglepunkter:
  • EU indførte sanktioner mod russiske individer og organisationer bag GPS-forstyrrelser i Baltikum.
  • Russisk jamming i Østersøen truer civil søfart.
  • Læs her *Europe Announces Sanctions Over GPS Jamming in the Baltics

---

2. US Space Command advarsel

• Citeret i Ars Technica (juni 2026):
  • Leader of US Space Command advarede om, at Rusland har operativiseret antisatellitvåben, der kan målrette mod US-regeringssatellitter.
  • Kilde

---

🛠️ Tekniske værktøjer & datakilder

(Kilder, der understøtter videoens datavisualiseringer)

1. GPSwise

• Brugt i Veritasium-videoen til at visualisere GPS-jamming og spoofing.
• Firma: GPSwise (specialiseret i GNSS-interferensovervågning).
• Nøglepunkter:
  • Leverer real-time overvågning af GNSS-forstyrrelser.
  • Bruges af luftfartsindustrien, lufthavne og forsvar.
  • Læs mere her *GPSwise Featured in Veritasium Video

---

2. International GNSS Service (IGS)

• Data fra 165 referencestationer blev brugt i forskningen.
• Hjemmeside: https://igs.org
• Nøglepunkter:
  • Højfrekvente (1 Hz) GNSS-data fra stationer i Europa, Grønland og Canada.
  • Data er offentligt tilgængelige via Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (CDDIS) (NASA).

---

📊 Samlet oversigt over nøglefakta fra kilderne

🔍 Hvordan kilderne understøtter videoen

1. Videnskabelig validering:

   • arXiv-papiret og konferencepublikationerne fra Todd Humphreys og Zach Clements er primærkilderne, der direkte underbygger videoens videnskabelige påstande.
   • RNL (Radionavigation Laboratory) og US Air Force har bekræftet forskningen.

2. Tekniske beviser:

   • GPSwise blev brugt i videoen til at visualisere forstyrrelserne (nævnt i GPSwise-bloggen).
   • IGS-data (165 stationer) blev analyseret for at spore kilden.

3. Mediedækning:

   • Ars Technica, Boing Boing, Sky News, AP News opsummerer forskningen for et bredere publikum.

4. Politiske reaktioner:

   • EU-sanktioner og US Space Command-advarsler viser, at problemet tages alvorligt på politisk plan.

---

📌 Anbefalede kilder at starte med

Hvis du vil dybdegående forstå emnet, anbefaler jeg at starte med: 1. arXiv-papiret "Chasing Lightning" (den mest detaljerede kilde). 2. Ars Technica-artiklen (god opsummering). 3. RNL's udtalelse (bekræftelse fra forskerne).

Meta-Style Smart Glasses bannes på Defcon 34 https://www.gadgetreview.com/def-con-34-bans-meta-style-smart-glasses-over-privacy-and-surveillance-concerns